A Frame-Up Cover-Up for the Oil, Investment-Bank-Laundered
Opium Revenues, And for War on Islamic Populism
The Certain Motive
Evidence of price-fixing by Goldman & Sachs was destroyed in the WTC bombing
New WTC Evidence Raises Questions of Destruction of Evidence of US Corporation Executive's Guilt in WTC Destruction
--------------------------------
The evidence that the destruction of the WTC was to destroy evidence contained on the 23rd and 24th floors of the North Tower is now incontrovertible. This message is the first revelation of the evidence that makes this conclusion a certainty. As yet, no one has contacted any authorities with this information.
I want you to provide me with lists of names I can contact in government and elsewhere around the world. I also want you to work by your own avenues to get to any officials or law enforcement agencies with jurisdiction in this case. A war and the greatest crime in history are involved, and many of the people responsible are standing in the way of justice.
Here is evidence supplied by the head of security of the WTC, John Tabeek (spelling unconfirmed) on network television indicating that the FBI floors--the 22nd, 23rd and 24th floors--of the North Tower, 70 floors below the crash impact, had been devastated and reduced to debris. It was this same individual who dug through to get to trapped persons (whom he saved). [At this time of writing it is unsure of the exact title of John Tabeek, as it has since been learned that another Head of Security, ex FBI Director of Counterterrorism, John O’Neill, was only two days into his new job at the WTC where he got killed on 11 September—Tabeek could have been his immediate replacement. It has also been learned since this article came out that O’Neill resigned the FBI in protest after the call from higher ups to cease the investigation into Osama bin Laden].
But it was on these floors that the entire accumulation of evidence and investigation briefs on two highly important cases were being stored:
1) The case against Mobil Oil and James Giffen on illegal oil swaps between Iran and Kazakhstan (which at that time was before a New York grand jury and is described in great detail by Seymore Hersh in the July 9 New Yorker Magazine);
2) And even more important, the evidence in the investigation of GOLD PRICE FIXING stemming from charges brought against Alan Greenspan, Morgan & Company and Goldman Sachs.
Below is a full reconstruction of this crime which is now all but confirmed by this revelation of a bomb devastating the FBI floors of the North Tower before the tower collapsed.
At noon I received a phone call from New England from Steve. He was reviewing recorded footage of coverage of the destruction of the WTC on NBC's program "48 Hours." Steve has reviewed the footage many times and taken detailed notes.
I took notes at my computer as he spoke. After the South Tower collapsed, men went up to the 22nd floor of the WTC and "dug" someone out of the "rubble." (It is known that these floors contained the New York FBI offices--Peter Jennings actually did a two-day network news story on the effects of the destroyed evidence and files on American financial crime investigations around the world.)
The "48 Hours" anchor was interviewing the head of security of the WTC about the evacuation. He had received a call, after the South Tower was down, from the Port Authority's Command Center on the 22nd floor asking for rescue. The head of security himself travelled to that floor in the company of a NY fireman where they found the offices devastated to the point where they had to "tunnel through debris" to "dig out" the two or three Port Authority workers who were trapped there. All of this happened 73 floors below crash impact.
The man who called me about this, Steve from Maine, said that he had received information (from someone ... whose name I recall from my address book) detailing the evidence for a terror frame-up and that he had been reviewing three lists of occupants of the WTC.
He gave the sites for two different listings of WTC tower occupants, which I copied as follows:
1) Tenants by floor and square footage: www.cnn.com/special/2001/trade.center/tenants1.html
2) Occupation by tenancy:
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/article/tower1.html
He noticed from these that listings were given for all floors EXCEPT floors 23 and 24. These floors were immediately above the location of the call for "digging out" rescue from the floor below, which indicates that the debris had fallen down from a destructive event occurring on the floor directly above. Steve left off with this statement (which I am not now able to confirm): "The Murrah Building in Oaklahoma City was where all of the records of the Waco Seige were being kept. I think this is their MO." Meaning their modus operandi, i.e., their distinctive pattern of crime. [A fertilizer truck bomb purportedly brought down the Murrah Building in Oklahoma. Since then, testimony from a former military brass has said otherwise, that it was impossible. See "The Reality of Israeli-Zionism Infiltration" Menu, article entitled, "9-11 Conspiracy Theories Given Currency By Mainstream Media" further on.]
Here is the post that prompted Steve's phone call:
Below I present what I think are incontrovertible reasons for concluding that the WTC/Pentagon crash/bombings were a frame-up designed to benefit members of, at least, these four groups:
1) People profiting from the opium trade of the Northern Alliance drug lords, and the money laundering through global investment channels that the opium trade and the derivative heroin trade supports.
2) People seeking control of the $6 trillion worth of oil and natural gas in Central Asia.
3) People seeking to win back support to increasingly unpopular Sharonist policies in Israel; and,
4) People arraigned before a grand jury on charges of fixing gold prices, illegal involvement in oil swaps between Kazakhstan and (sanctioned) Iran, and bribery in cases where all incriminating documentary evidence was stored in FBI files and data banks in one of the Twin Towers of the WTC.
All four of these groups have fluid secret channels of communication through networked integration of banking, politics, the CIA and Mossad connections. The fact is if one of these groups was complicit the other three would have to be also.
Here are three independently developed arguments:
Best guess origins of the WTC/Pentagon crash/bombing frame-up.
Mossad and the CIA were supporting traffick in Afghan-opium-derived heroin--devoting public resources to protect and assist the suppliers and distributors of the multi-trillion-dollar money-laundered drug revenue deposits backing the global investments of American and British elite finance.
The Afghan Northern Alliance drug lords grow 70% to 90% of the world's opium, the prime ingredient of heroin. The opium, which is moved across the small China-Afghan border for processing and distribution by the giant People's Liberation Army--that amazing transnational corporation, Triad drug cartel and military super military establishment all in one. Against the tremendous stake interests of this giant outlaw network, the morally conservative Taliban had been eradicating Afghan opium production, suppressing supply to drug lords and the drug-revenue flow to money-laundering establishment bankers and global investors alike.
Thus, "crisis" became the initial motivation of a renegade group of CIA and/or Mossad in seeking ways to defeat Afghanistan's Talibanist government. (Nothing absurd so far, right?)
Next, the Russian and Kazakh mafias have criminal ties to U.S. executive James Giffen in Kazakhstan--a man under investigation by a New York grand jury in the months before September 11 for illegal involvement in oil swaps between Kazakhstan and (sanctioned) Iran. (See the August 9 New Yorker Magazine for a full account of this by Seymore Hershe). All of the evidence for this crime was being kept at the WTC on the 20th through 25th floors of one of the Twin Towers where the FBI had its New York offices, and James Giffen is the key man everyone has to go through to get any oil agreement with Kazakhstan, including any pipelines built that would traverse Afghanistan. (There is $6 trillion dollars worth of oil and gas in Central Asia.)
Giffen certainly understood--if he did not originate the idea --that if he could/can get operatives (even "captured" vengeful Islamic activists whose rage could be shaped and directed to use of terror) to destroy the FBI offices in the WTC building and the documentation evidence it contained, then he would escape grand jury indictment, and as a powerful added benefit, the (framed) Taliban would be replaced with a regime in Afghanistan that would permit a pipeline to be built, preferably a Northern Alliance drug lord government that would harmonize with Giffen's own unethical (murderous) entrepreneurial style. (See the New Yorker article for details of Giffen's history.)
So far this super-crime scheme involves only a small group of people: Russian Mafia and perhaps a Giffen/renegade CIA or a Giffen "dark-side" Mossad link. But other, even more powerful players may have had involvement where they stood to gain tremendously if the crash/bomb frame-up were successfully accomplished.
Prior to September 11, charges had been brought against Alan Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan & Co., and other powerful American financial figures and institutions (reportedly a very well-documented case) over the fixing of gold prices (with evidence for that case too, stored by the FBI on the FBI floors of the WTC!). These parties would not only profit heavily from the "carrot" of both oil and drug monies circulating through their great financial institutions, but they also would gain from avoiding the "stick" of one of the most threatening lawsuits ever to confront the U.S. financial establishment. (Realize what a guilty verdict in this case would mean to these leading financial families and to the Establishment in general!) These parties would welcome predictable and certainly substantial benefits from the destruction of the evidence in the WTC and of some of the witnesses and researchers on the case as well.
Notice that so far we have powerful men with powerful incentives who characteristically operate in secret and under the protection of wealth, status and power. In addition, there is the carrot of $2 trillion in annual drug revenues funneled through the banking system that has funded much of the proceeds to fund the development of the Princeling-Triad dictatorship in China. (The communist government has been in the opium business since the 1930's. Mao pioneered the model, later followed by Peru's Shining Path and Columbia's Maoist F.A.R.C. narco-terrorists. And Zhou Enlai devised the plan in the 1950's of weakening American society through a drug invasion.)
"China White" heroin distributed by the People's Liberation Army, made from Afghan opium, link the bankers and oilmen to the corrupt and renegade secret state agencies of the CIA, FBI and Mossad. Renegade agents of either agency may have seen this opportunity for mutual gain and found the way (having profiles of each of the players) to propose the crash/bombing frame-up as the best "solution" to each of the players, i.e. to each of the player's most troublesome problems, while making enormous profits besides.
Note that the Bush's are tied to both the CIA and oil, and through Mena Arkansas drug smuggling and through the Iran-Contra drugs and arms deals, etc. (Drug world investigator Daniel Hopsicker, as well as Noam Chomsky and many others have exposed this thoroughly, at least in the broad strokes necessary to support this reconstruction of the crime.)
The facts of the drug connections are known to everyone from the Russians, to the John Birchers, to Wired Magazine, Harpers, New Yorker, the Village Voice, The Nation, and Rolling Stone Magazine, all having explored the drug-Establishment connections in great detail, which brings us to Ariel Sharon.
Sharon's hardheaded policy of retaliation regardless of 'collateral damage' and his provocation at the mosque cost him dearly in world opinion. In fact, the Bush Administration was very close to initiating a major policy shift (obviously known to Sharon from the greatest intelligence organization in the world). Bush was planning the recognition/sponsorship of a separate Palestinian state. Also war crime charges had been brought against Sharon in the international court, further putting his hard-line policy against the Palestinians in unfavorable light.
Mindful of Ariel Sharon's self-made hard spot, it is entirely possible that the same CIA or Mossad mastermind that thought of the crash/bombing frame-up plan in the first place decided to take the risk of telling Sharon about the plan, offering it as a solution to the trapped old "freedom fighter's" problems as well. If the U.S. could be made to think that the hated Osama bin Laden--that Islamic fundamentalism itself--is responsible for destroying the Twin Towers of the WTC and the American government itself, then, as Sharon would certainly grasp, American opinion would radically swing to an extremely hard line against all Muslim and Arab entities not securely under their thumb, and most particularly, from Sharon's viewpoint, against Palestinians.
No profile of Sharon gives any indication that he would not close on such a deal-- such a self-serving of his own good being his prime directive.
And that is all that was needed to carry off this operation.
The getting and conditioning/deceiving of hijackers is an easy affair.
Mossad has infiltrated bin Laden's forces in Central Asia and the Mid East, but it is a radically decentralized organization (as it must be to remain viable). So it was an easy matter for this "dark-side" Mossad, with Sharon's clandestine approval, to trick some very angry and vengeful Arabs (or some other anti-Zionist or anti-globalization radicals to agree to hijack the four planes) into thinking they were doing it for bin Laden. Millions in the world hated America and the globalization that the World Trade Center represents. These recruited hijackers need not have been Arabs, there are Croats, Serbs, Latin Americans and Iranians and any number of other victim-pool people who could have volunteered to conduct the hijacking, possibly without fully understanding the end result of the mission.
These hijackers need not have "signed on" for a suicide bombing. Further, many aviation experts on the net are describing a system built into commercial airliners for taking over control of flight from the ground, a system developed to combat terrorism. It is possible that the course of the plane's flight was taken over by this system installed to thwart hijackers (detailed in several reports on the web.)
But if the crashes were not effected in this way, psychological-control methods, wholly sufficient for the job, were also available. The technology of behavior control is further advanced than the popular press has made people aware. Skilled psy op agents can get subjects angry enough and convinced enough of the justice and good effects of 'acts' represented as serving their 'cause' to be willing to undertake even suicidal missions. (Activist Alan Yu has researched this technology, as have other researchers from a broad spectrum of political orientation.)
And this is all that is needed to conduct the terror act.
But then what?
When the crashes take place, word merely has to be put out by those involved, the CIA, Mossad, Sharon and those complicit in the Bush Administration (based on his behavior, my money is on Paul Wolfowitz) to push the theme that bin Laden was responsible and that this aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the only immediate appropriate reaction. As the spin goes, the Afghans are responsible for "harboring" bin Laden and that "harboring is exactly the same as terrorism" and that for that reason the entire Afghan government must be terminated (must be "ended as a state" to use Wolfowitz's revealing phrasing of September 12.)
The frame-up has all sorts of collateral benefits for the perpetrators. Now the perpetrators can tell the unsuspecting that bin Laden's guilt has been established beyond doubt, that for the sake of the security and safety of Israel and the United States that it is necessary that the impression of an "open and shut case" must be spun. Thus, the news media is exhorted to be patriotic and exemplary "wartime correspondents" and sets about selling the blaming of bin Laden and advocating war and overthrow in Afghanistan. The news media have been deceitfully led to believe the government line of who bombed the buildings; and among the elite of the news publishers, they "know" it is in the best interests of Israel and Wall Street that this be the response, that this be the spin.
And Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair each benefit enormously, politically.
Trillions of dollars are enough to subdue and suppress criticism of the investigation, after all, who would know better than the CIA and Mossad exactly who is responsible? The fact has been reported, in a different context of course, that the U.S. intelligence receives all of its ground intelligence from Central Asia through Mossad's network of infiltrator spies. In other words, whatever "proofs" the U.S. has--and has shown to Tony Blair and NATO--has come exclusively through Sharon via Mossad. The "evidence," so-called, is thus no counterweight to this reconstruction of the crime. The "evidence" comes exclusively from the prime "frame-up" suspect.
Has Mossad done this kind of thing before? Remember the USS Liberty, an American ship with flag flying, deliberately attacked and sunk (in multiple attack waves) with efforts to kill every sailor aboard, either to destroy information that the ship may have intercepted, or to frame Arab states to gain the support of American public opinion. (There are other cases involving the blowing up of a disco dance nightclub, again, to frame targeted enemies, a case actually brought to light by the non-renegade "good side" Mossad.)
The cover up apparently has unlimited resources. Two [Israeli] Mossad men caught red handed days after the WTC crash/bombings were carrying explosive charges and detonation controls in the government chambers of the Mexican legislature. Apparently, big bribes have been paid because these men have been set free.
One surmises, that if the truth were to get out, that appeals will be made to the bogeyman of a "destabilizing international crisis." This is the ancient cloak of the deviant ruling elites.
How many readers, even if they strongly suspect that this reconstruction fits the facts, would deny the conclusion anyway because of fear of what this fact would do to Israel's reputation and thus to her security and survival?
Yet this view may be wrong. If Israeli's on the "good side" were to arrest Sharon and chase down the renegades of the Mossad "dark side" and bring them to justice, tensions in the Mid East would dissolve, and good faith restored. This good faith will never return to the world as long as the greatest terror frame-up in history is not corrected by justice and the truth.
Also, if this reconstruction is valid, then that certainly raises the likelihood that Ariel Sharon was also the man who gave the order for the murder of Yhitzak Rabin, Israel's greatest peacemaker (if that title does not go to Begin for his treaty with Sadat). Conviction of Sharon would mean that the warmongering "take-no-prisoners" school of Zionism would at last be discredited and that the humanitarian way of Rabin could again be given another chance, with the Palestinians gaining restored faith in Israel's capacity to be fair and just after seeing Sharon removed and brought to justice.
I know that at this point you are poised to throw the usual tomatoes and call me a "loon" and a "Nazi," but I know that those who call me those names are themselves fearful that this analysis may be right. (And I forgive you in advance for having to throw those tomatoes out of loyalty, and not knowing what else to do in your uncertainty.)
It is a rotten world all around, but my advice is to seek the truth wherever it leads, and then to enforce justice against the real authors of the September 11 terror, whoever they may be, and to go after Sharon just as strenuously as you were recently ready to hunt down bin Laden.
And of course, the United States has a similar house cleaning of its topmost shelves of power and influence, a job that we have been putting off since the 1870's. (How the entire world will benefit from that job!)
And I should make this clearer: The media are not silent because they are complicit in the terrors. They are silent because they are "yes men" who "know where their bread is buttered" and they are not about to jump up and say "Sharon did it" until they see others in their positions doing so. This is consistent with today's "Dilbert" world of Establishment-monopolized organizations. Only an earth-shaking event, like the exposing of the Establishment's role in the WTC terror, will shake down this system.
Now, let's discuss this intelligently.
26 September 2001
The 9-11 Wolfowitz Conspiracy
A Frame-Up Cover-Up for the Oil,
Investment-Bank-Laundered Opium Revenues,
And for War on Islamic Populism - The Certain Motive
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
Next I will supply information on the two criminal cases in which critical evidence and files were destroyed - the Iran oil swap case and the gold price fixing.
eastman@wolfenet.com
Author's Note
Key articles available at:
http://www.memes.org/article.php?sid=743
http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm
(Many helpful discussant/activists archived here)
I recommend:
Non-CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] news and analysis of the WTC crash bombing frame-up of Afghanistan and related matters:
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com
http://www.rense.com
http://www.copvcia.com
http://www.Public-Action.com
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/
http://daastol.com/EurasianGreatGame/
Solution oriented (my living inspirations):
http://www.whatmatters.nu/wmemails/wmemailsindex.html
http://members.ams.chello.nl/jsteenis
Action:
Ron Paul for President in 2004
(Both a call for reform and a protest in one well-placed constructive best shot)
http://www.petitiononline.com/Paul2004
Posted on the Independent Newswire on 3 December 2001
Ref: www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=99717&group=webcast
To next article for Insights-Reflections-Analysis
Phase 1 “Know” Menu
Looking for Justice in All the Wrong Places Menu
Insights-Reflections-Analysis Menu
Covering Up the Cover Up Menu
The Reality of Israeli Zionist Infiltration Menu
Are We On the Path of Expanding Liberty or Tyranny?
Declaring Independence and A State of Global Rebellion Menu
A Picture of the Stars and A Voice from the Ethers Menu
Interim Addendums During Phase 1
